Anthropic confirmed it refused a Chinese request for access to its newest model Mythos, the New York Times reported. The Times framed the denial as evidence that the latest Anthropic and OpenAI models are extending the U.S. lead over China at the frontier model layer. The report lands the morning President Trump is set to depart for the May 14-15 Beijing summit with Xi Jinping, where AI joins the Strait of Hormuz and Taiwan as a top three agenda item, as reported by NPR in AIPD's May 11th edition.
Read at NYT ↗
The Republican-led House Oversight Committee opened an investigation into OpenAI Chief Executive Sam Altman's business dealings, the Wall Street Journal reported. The committee sent the company a letter requesting documents on governance practices and potential conflicts tied to Altman backed companies. Six Republican state attorneys general from Florida, Montana, Nebraska, Iowa, West Virginia and Louisiana urged the Securities and Exchange Commission to review OpenAI's governance before any IPO, per Investing.com summarizing the WSJ report. The scrutiny follows prior WSJ reporting on Altman's efforts to have OpenAI support companies he personally invested in, including nuclear fusion startup Helion and aerospace firm Stoke Space. OpenAI board chairman Bret Taylor defended Altman during a Monday court hearing in the Musk v. Altman trial, saying the chief executive had been forthright about outside investments.
Read at WSJ ↗ • Read at Investing.com ↗
An internal Trump administration fight pits the Commerce Department against intelligence agencies over an expanded IC role in evaluating frontier AI models, the Washington Post reported. Reporters Cat Zakrzewski, Ellen Nakashima and Nitasha Tiku cite named sources and reference internal documents, noting that a related website was removed amid White House sensitivities. The dispute follows Commerce's CAISI signing binding pre-release testing pacts with Google DeepMind, Microsoft and xAI, as reported by NIST in AIPD's May 6th edition.
Read at Washington Post ↗
Newly disclosed FOIA documents obtained by Democracy Forward show DOGE delivered a PowerPoint last summer pitching an AI tool called SweetREX at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, FedScoop reported. The tool, named for DOGE associate Christopher Sweet, would analyze every HUD regulation and recommend keeping, deleting or partially deleting each one, with deletion presented as "the default case." The HUD regulations covered include the prohibition of sex-based discrimination in mortgage assistance and foreclosure legal aid. The disclosure was first reported by The Lever and shared with FedScoop. The pitch told HUD employees the tool would "automate all the most time-consuming steps in deregulation" while leaving staff in control throughout the process.
Read at FedScoop ↗
Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson sent letters to 15 technology companies, including Amazon, Alphabet, Apple, Automattic, Bumble, Discord, Match Group, Meta, Microsoft, Pinterest, Reddit, SmugMug, Snapchat, TikTok and X, reminding them of obligations under the Take It Down Act with a May 19 compliance deadline, per an FTC press release. The law requires covered platforms to take down nonconsensual images, and all identical copies, within 48 hours of receiving a valid request. The Take It Down Act, signed last year by President Trump with the support of First Lady Melania Trump, targets nonconsensual intimate imagery including AI generated deepfakes. Ferguson said the agency stands "ready to monitor compliance, investigate violations, and enforce the Take It Down Act."
Read at FTC ↗
Plaintiff lawyers in pending wrongful death suits against OpenAI are advancing a consumer product safety legal theory that would expose chatbot makers to product defect liability standards, the New York Times reported. The theory seeks to apply existing consumer product safety statutes to chatbot companies for harms tied to user suicides and violent acts. A favorable ruling would reframe chatbot liability around product defect doctrine rather than speech or Section 230. The argument extends seven complaints over the Tumbler Ridge mass shooting filed April 29 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaints allege GPT-4o was a defective product that failed to challenge the shooter or refer her flagged account to law enforcement, per OPB.
Read at NYT ↗ • Read at OPB ↗